The healthcare industry has seen a significant shift in recent years with the adoption of electronic health records (EHRs). EHRs offer numerous benefits, including improved patient care and reductions in medical errors. However, the integration of technology in healthcare has also presented challenges, particularly in legal proceedings related to malpractice claims. This blog post explores the effects of EHRs on cancer treatment and medical malpractice claims, taking a closer look at the benefits and limitations of these digital records.
How Electronic Health Records Are Utilized
Electronic health records can significantly improve the quality of cancer care received by patients. EHRs offer clinicians up-to-date, accurate health information essential for providing personalized care tailored to the needs of each patient. Moreover, EHRs provide decision support tools that assist in the coordination of care between multiple healthcare providers, ensure that care is evidence-based, and improve patient outcomes.
Electronic Health Records in Legal Proceedings
However, EHRs have limitations when used as evidence in legal proceedings. Healthcare organizations have been sued using excerpts from EHR records that can be taken out of context. This can create confusion and misinterpretation by non-medical legal professionals, which could result in negative legal outcomes. Healthcare providers, therefore, must ensure that their EHR templates are tailored, up-to-date, and complete to avoid misinterpretation in legal proceedings.
Moreover, lawyers have argued that the electronic documentation of healthcare interactions neglects the subtleties and nuances of the interactions between a patient and provider. For instance, electronic documentation can lack the depth of the observations and disclosures from patients and offer an incomplete picture of the care provided.
Electronic Health Records and Medical Malpractice
EHRs have also generated challenges in medical malpractice claims. Medical malpractice lawsuits rely on traditional healthcare documentation, which is mostly provided during subjugation related to EHRs. Plaintiffs may argue that these records are incomplete or inaccurate, further aggravating or complicating a case. The opposing counsel's job will be to prove otherwise and that the documentation provided is accurate, complete, and, most importantly, communicated or given to the concerned patient directly.
EHRs have revolutionized the medical field, offering vast benefits to both patients and healthcare providers. EHRs have improved cancer treatment by providing accurate, up-to-date health information and enhancing coordination between different healthcare providers. However, EHRs' integration has also presented challenges in medical malpractice claims, as incomplete or inaccurate records may impede fair and equitable resolution.
New York Medical Malpractice Lawyers
When it comes to choosing legal representation for your personal injury or medical malpractice case, experience matters.
At Simonson Goodman Platzer PC, we have a long, proven track record of success. In fact, our attorneys have successfully recovered compensation in 98% of the cases we have handled and have secured more than $200 million to date in both settlements and verdicts.
Call (800) 817-5029 or submit a free online case evaluation form to get started.